Why Web2.0 concept of "Fire"?


Interestingly, people see the concept of fire is not a fire, not to see the application of this concept reflects the acceptance by the user is much more limited, but look at this concept is the risk investors to accept more limited.For example, 03 blog, 04's telecom value-added, 05 of p2p, Freewap so true.Web2.0 concepts in early 2006 by venture capital investors and the media in hot pursuit, while a lot to talk about web2.0-based blogger who has a collective silence to say that this is an interesting phenomenon.

Web2.0 represents the segments, the pursuit of long tail market, "blue ocean" of competition typical of the concept in 2005 to take shape gradually, as the representative of the Internet out of the winter, this ray of sunshine, and represents a new spring, dormantinvestors under the guidance of the sun in this thread, have shot, and each gains.I am very hesitant to ask why the recent extraordinary investment in the fire began, but also why the recent investment began to cool, the answer was "feel."You are in the industry, talking and communication, usually a large extent is feeling.Investment in the industry has never been cool.

Funds into another to produce a demonstration effect, and further promote the increase of the entrepreneur, you can see, and even a lot of strange plans, a lot of duplicate programs, such as, suddenly, such as spring night, hundreds of video sites to come outthe.Popular online games ago, when the country is no more than dozens of teams do.Lightweight applications, the slogan is a lot of people get rich quickly.

Perhaps the enthusiasm slowly faded gold, can truly make web2.0 "fire" up the media for their silence PR, blogger who can really hear the true voice, and these investors are the collective soul-searching beforelet market, a real pro, not pro-investor user applications and services.